Elia

Ist er dann wohl auch.... Der alte lässt sich aber ja schlecht nachträglich sicherer machen. Und sie behaupten ja auch NICHT, dass Geldfälschen jetzt schwieriger wird, sondern nur dass der neue Schein sicherer ist.

Vom Abstoßen der Hörner http://date-or-die.blogspot.de/2014/01/vom-abstoen-der-horner.html

Superwitzig, Mendoza, mir tun schon die Oberschenkel weh! Magste nicht auch vielleicht noch ein paar Türkenwitze erzählen?

Sehenswertes Video, tolle Rede, beeindruckende Frau !

Frauen können sich verlieben. Männer können sich verlieben. Männer können "needy" sein. Frauen können "needy" sein. Und bevor die Frage aufkommt: Ja, Linkshänder können auch "needy" sein.

und er braucht echt lang für das Buch...

Herzlich Willkommen im Creative Room mein Freund !

Hast du Schwestern ?

...und da saßen sie wieder alle in ihren Kinderzimmern und dachten an das Jugendfoto von Mutti...

Erstens hast du hier niemanden als "rechts" bezeichnet, sondern als "Gestapo". Zweitens muss ICH das gar nicht aushalten, weil du ja schön feige natürlich nur Leute so bezeichnet hast, die nicht hier sind, und sich hier nicht dazu äussern können , und nicht MICH. Was du allerdings sehr gerne nachholen, und dann nochmal mit den Moderatoren diskutieren darfst, wenn du möchtest. Drittens ist es schlicht und ergreifend OFFTOPIC hier jetzt eine Diskussion über die Frauenpolitik der SPD oder die Gleichstellung von Mann und Frau aufmachen zu wollen. Und viertens solltest du ganz dringend nochmal das Wort "Gleichstellung" googeln. Zum Einstieg für dich hier schon mal: Unter Gleichstellung versteht man die Maßnahmen der Angleichung der Lebenssituation von im Prinzip als gleichwertig zu behandelnden Bevölkerungsgruppen (wie Frau und Mann), unter Gleichbehandlung die Maßnahmen zur Angleichung der benachteiligten gesellschaftlichen Gruppen (Behinderte, Migranten, Kinder bildungsferner Eltern) in allen Lebensbereichen. Die Begriffe umfassen die Chancengleichheit und die soziale Gerechtigkeit auf Grundlage der Menschenrechte Gleichstellung der Geschlechter ist der Prozess tatsächlicher Gleichstellung von Geschlechtern in rechtlicher Hinsicht und im Hinblick auf ihr persönliches und berufliches Entfaltungspotential in einer Gesellschaft (Chancengleichheit). Gleichstellung als Ausdruck sozialer Gerechtigkeit führt zu einer gleichen Teilhabe an persönlichen Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten. Damit schafft Gleichstellung der Geschlechter auch die Freiheit und den gesellschaftliche Raum, individuelle Lebensentwürfe zu realisieren. Statt der älteren Bezeichnung Gleichstellung von Frau und Mann wird in jüngerer Zeit der neutralere Ausdruck Gleichstellung der Geschlechter bevorzugt. Damit soll auf den gleichberechtigten Anspruch auf Gleichheit von Mann und Frau und möglichen dritten Geschlechtern (Transgendern) verwiesen werden.

Oh Gott... da liegt ja schon nicht mehr nur Staub auf dem Thema, sonder das schimmelt ja auch schon an allen Ecken und Enden... Der Text ist ziemlich langweilig und an manchen Stellen auch etwas daneben. Ich kenne bisher nur einen wirklich guten Text zu dem Thema, den ich zwar schon einige Male hier gepostet habe, aber das Thema wird ja anscheinend auch alle 4 Monate neu aufgemacht.... So here we go: Shit Test Paranoia By Mark Manson I’ve been meaning to address this for a while now, the obsession and paranoia some guys have about shit tests. For those who are uninitiated, a shit test is an old PUA term to describe a woman who says something derogatory to you to see how you react. The theory is that she is testing your dominance, your will, your frame, your confidence, etc. in order to judge how attractive you really are. Typically it comes in the form of snooty comments such as, “Are you gay?” or “Don’t you have any other friends?” or making fun of your shirt or whatever. Woman test you when she’s attracted to you but she wants to make sure you’re for real. The idea is that she challenges you in some way, and you have to prove to her that you’re unaffected by her interjections. In the past, I went into depth on how to handle shit tests here. If you’re unfamiliar with the concept, you probably want to take a moment and review that post. Here I want to address shit test paranoia. Over the years, guys commonly come to me with all of these shit tests that women throw at them asking me how they should deal with them. I usually point them to the above post or just repeat what’s said there. But here’s the interesting part: I’d say 80% of the time, what the guys perceive as shit tests aren’t actually shit tests at all. In fact, I’m not a huge fan of the shit test label in general. I think it’s another PUA concept that ends up hurting more than it helps. But first, I’ll explain the two most common ways guys misinterpret women’s actions as shit tests when they’re really not. The first is teasing. I’d say a solid 50% of the questions I get concerning women testing a guy are no more than a girl teasing and flirting with the guy in question. I always have to reassure these guys that this is indeed a good thing. Women only tease guys they’re flirting with and they only flirt with men that they’re attracted to. How some good-natured ribbing qualifies as a shit test in the minds of these guys is beyond me. Or actually, scratch that, they interpret them as shit tests because they’re overly-sensitive and taught by books they’ve read that they must be prepared to overcome any adversity a woman throws at them. This is a bunch of BS. Your guy friends tease you. Your family teases you. Are they shit testing you? Are their teases something that must be deflected or conquered? No, it’s merely a sign of playful affection, so treat it that way. As with most PUA concepts, the idea of the shit test creates a defensive mindset in the guy, the idea that this is some obstacle that must be overcome and defeated rather than accepted and connected with. The other common situation which men erroneously perceive to be “shit tests” is when a woman is a plain rejection. The most popular example is the so-called “I have a boyfriend” shit test. This isn’t a shit test. This is her saying she’s not interested in you. Even if she’s lying and is single, she’s turned off, not receptive and is probably not worth the effort. Other common rejections that are misinterpreted as shit tests: “I have to go,” “Here, talk to my friend,” “We’re lesbians,” or of course, the obvious “Sorry, I’m not interested.” Shit tests are actually quite rare. And believe it or not, they become more common the closer and more intimate you are with a woman. Anyone who’s been married or lived with a girlfriend can tell you that you get tested on a daily basis. Girls I meet in bars almost never shit test me. My ex-girlfriend of two years barraged me constantly with them. Shit tests only happen when a woman is already very attracted to you to the point that it makes her uncomfortable. She eases this comfort by testing you. It’s her sub-conscious saying, “I’m so into this guy that it’s scary. I don’t know how trustworthy he is. Here, I’ll say something obnoxious to see if he’s for real or not.” It’s a screening strategy for women, since they have so much more to gain/lose by emotionally invested themselves in a guy. This is also why the rate of shit tests increase proportionally to the level of intimacy you share. This is also why one of the most common shit tests on the planet is some permutation of “You must be gay.” Sure, sometimes this can be used as a tease or rejection, but women you just meet out at a bar or club will pull this one out when they become extremely attracted to you quickly. Think about it for a second, what do all women say about gay guys? That they’re hot. They’re emotionally expressive, dress well, make her laugh and are physical with her without inhibitions. All things that we teach you to do in the dating advice industry. She’s turned on, she doesn’t really know what to do with the situation. She really likes you but just met you and doesn’t know you. She feels a little nervous and doesn’t completely trust you. And so she blurts out, “You have to be gay, right?” It has nothing to do with you. It has everything to do with her. If you react negatively, or show any irritation (remember: the quickest turn off for a woman is a man who is intimidated by her), then she’ll lose attraction for you. Her sub-conscious will be eased because you’ll just be another douchebag trying to get into her pants. But if you’re unaffected, and if you come back at her with even more playfulness and ease, if you accept her insecurity and rest with it, bringing her up to your level with confidence and care, then you’re reaffirming to her that, in fact, you are a ridiculously hot guy she just met. It’s a win/win situation for her. If you fail, you expose yourself as a fraud and she can rest easy. If you pass with flying colors, then she knows she really has a catch. It’s win/win for her. That’s why she does it. So, how to tell the difference between teases/shit-tests/rejections? Keep this in mind: - If she makes a derogatory comment with playful and fun intentions and she likes you, then she is teasing you and flirting. This is GOOD. It means she likes you. - If she makes a derogatory comment with serious intentions and she likes you, then she is testing you. This is GOOD. It means she REALLY likes you. - If she makes a derogatory comment with serious intention and she doesn’t like you, then she is rejecting you. This is also GOOD. Because we don’t want to waste our time with girls who aren’t interested in us. Like I said, the first and third options are by far the most common. I think most guys would be served well by ignoring the shit test concept for the most part until they get a fair amount of experience under their belt. Chances are you won’t get tested often early in an interaction, especially if you’re not generating much attraction. If the girls aren’t attracted to you, they’re not testing you, they’re rejecting you. A caveat to all of this is if there is something highly unique or outstanding about you. For instance, if you’re much older than her, or you dress in an extreme or bizarre way, expect to be tested frequently and early. In these cases, women are doing it to test your congruence and confidence. If you walk around with a fuzzy top hat, or are hitting on girls 20 years younger than yourself, that implies a lot of confidence and gusto. Therefore women are going to want to test that in you quite a bit before they trust you.

Selten einen so inhalts- und argument-freien Post gelesen. Da steht eigentlich nur drin, dass du bestimmte Menschen für ihre politische Meinung abgrundtief hasst und dir zu ihrer Beschimpfung nicht einmal abartigste Nazi-Vergleiche zu eklig sind. Ist das nicht genau das Verhalten, dass Leute wie du immer den Feministen vorwerft? Ich plädieren nochmal dringend dafür, diesen Thread zu schließen, da hier schon lange nicht mehr über das Thema des TE geschrieben wird, sondern nur noch die üblichen radikalen Hasstiraden einer (zum Glück und zu Recht) frustrierten Minderheit verbreitet werden.

Es gibt doch so Spielchen wie das 5-Fragen-Spiel und so ein Zeug. Damit gewinnt man fast immer zwei Sachen: Ein nettes Gespräch und ein Getränk. Und manchmal auch mehr... Und dann läufst du also durch den Club und machst den ganzen Abend das "5-Fragen-Spiel" bei 20 Leuten?

Ich dachte eigentlich immer es geht um Sex, aber das mit dem Alkohol ist auch spannend! Wie geht das?

ist mit den Gedanken woanders...

will doch nur spielen..

Is in love with noodles...

dann...